More Spalled Concrete

May 18, 2015

by Scott Oliphint

In our last two articles, we’ve been dealing with various objections that continue to be offered against a Covenantal approach to apologetics. The objection that we considered last time needs more explanation and discussion that we were able to give it in one article. We will continue that discussion in this article (and the next) in order to try more fully to address the objection itself. The hope is that these responses will be taken into account if the objection continues to be offered, rather than, as is often the case, simply repeating the objection as if nothing has been offered in response.

Though these objections to “presuppositionalism” continue to be asserted, they are rarely argued, and they rarely deal with the actual matters at hand.

continue reading on Reformation21.

Scott Oliphint

Dr. Oliphint (PhD, Westminster) is professor of apologetics and systematic theology at WTS.

Next Post...

A Discussion with Jonathan Master on Definite Atonement

May 11, 2015

by Jonathan Gibson